March 13 class notes
comptetencies
-
Had to have all the things in line first before we get to the internet - all the competencies. Everything had to come together
-
without insight, nothing works
-
we had to have imaginative leaps - the conceptualizations
- metaphors and ideas
-
timesharing
- batch processing
- these machines are way faster than human attention span
- enhance the usage of the machines
- making an argument on why no other computer might be necessary, foreclosing other options
-
The humble modem
- there needs to be a way of connecting the machine.
- Modems adapted for SAGE system in 1953.
-
But which computer to use?
- Another conceptual leap - connecting two computers (Moving data around)
- packet switching
- developed in US and UK at the same time.
- Supervening social necessity - nuclear war
-
idea of failure of communications leading to nuclear war
-
Us political context
- paul baran engineer at RAND, focuses on secure communications.
- go / no go over radio via am radio. military needs more than this.
- baran looks at the current module, investigates mathematics of networks
- fully distributed communication networks
-
store and forward
- message switching (think post office - integral message labeled with origin and desitnation
- telegraph does this, manually then computered
- baran's system is not hierarchical - least congestion is the route taken
-
not new
- pulling ideas and concepts from one field and recasting it for another.
- increminental jumps
- problem was storing the message and woking out the routing.
- broadcast analogy aint ideal.
- baran proposes indivudal message routing.
-
faster the switches work, the fewer complete messages they have to hold onto
-
at&t already had this. miliatiry voice network built on top of the existing civilian network.
- hardneded exchanges
- centrally controlled like a traffic control system.
- autonomy in switches and computerizing the routing of things is the big idea.
-
distributed adaptive messaging blockswitching!
- packet switching.
- everything is digital, the message can be anything but is represented as bits
- air force promotes baran
- baran and airforce withdraws from defense communications agency (they were phone people)
-
uk political context
- first and second dead white men
- concentrating on centralization
- not wanting the "wrong sort" to be involved
- task forces and projects set up
- developing interactive / time sharing computer rather than batch processing
- cost of long distance telecommunication
- davis develops packet switching to maximize a scarce resource, for baran it was about secure comms
- no one still knows the best way to interact with computers
- davis unveils packet switching but the british military already knew that the US had developed it.
- davis develops baran's work in a civilian context and he wants to bring down the cost - fairness and access
- PoS transactions, database queiries, online gambling, remote data processing
- Post office says NO
- government interference meant that all work had to have economic spinoffs.
- forcing computer companies to merge, killing off certain technologies and machines and components
- driving women off to make way for upper class men.
- britain is losing empire, they want control over the ruling class
-
meanwhile back in the us
- ARPA is birthed because uh oh! sputnik! (1957)
- space stuff needs to start. interagency politics.
- gets its hands on some computers
- licklider is responsible for directing computer projects at ARPA - shifts emphasis from pure calculations to things that we would recognize better today
- solving the big problem - all these devices need to be able to communicate
- in the case of armageddon, let's research anyway.
- how humans interact with machines leading to interest in information theory
- sage consoles had intergrated ashtrays
- blue-sky paper on what if the machines talk to each other (look up for Memex "man computer symbiosis")
- IPTO is dolling out money to research centers
- arpa makes a study on cooperative network timesharing
- a way of connecting IPNO centers together to conserve resources, arpanet project is made.
- early computer science centers included UCLA, SRI, illinois supercomputing, MIT.
- everyone wants a new machine, but if we can effectively wire all these places togehter then one can sit a terminal and access what they need from exisiting equipment.
-
networking mini computers. IMPs using packet switching.
- the social dimension
-
IPTO discovers Baran's 1960 paper, is now involved.
-
first request for quotes for the ARPANET comes in august 1968
-
first four imps, $360,000 each.
- programming to make them work $640,000
-
IPTO buys from honeywell instead.
-
imp is the ancestor to the router. how do we make this work? how do you actually make packet switching work?
-
what gets designed is a fusion between baran and davis' designs.
- fewer hardened cold war survivability, more of the high speed transmission adaptive routing.
- us is investing in pure research, uk sought immediate economic benefits
- arpanet becomes more sophisticated than NPL despite being second out the gate
-
englebart, influenced by as we may think, demos the online system. "the mother of all demos"
- hugely influenced subsequent developments
-
so much is going on!
- by focusing on IMPs and how to automatically read the network for congestion, BBN IPTO & ARPA sidestep the local mainframe people
-
local mainframe people are not really on board
-
by 1968/9 things are happening fast.
- extremely decentralized project
- SRI comes up with the LOGIN command
- many thoughts being produced by different groups
-
October 29 1969 = The Birth of the Internet
-
system crashed at the G of LOGIN
-
largely balding white guy story, but there's more to it. what else s going on here?
-
-
"Oh we got it working, how nice." video on last slide, never seen work as momentous, the idea of what else can we do with this